Results 1 to 10 of 19
  1. Rep:
    Posts
    36
    Points
    264
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    bandung, indonesia
    Question

    alive 1997 vs alive 2007

    Remove this ad: become a supporter
    am i the only one who prefer alive 1997 than alive 2007?

  2. Rep:
    aphrospice's Avatar
    Posts
    14
    Points
    125
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Default

    Re: alive 1997 vs alive 2007

    Honestly cant say. But Alive 2007 has a slight edge for me simply because of how they restructured the songs to make me fall in love with originals again.

  3. Rep:
    Posts
    36
    Points
    264
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    bandung, indonesia
    Default

    Re: alive 1997 vs alive 2007

    Quote Originally Posted by aphrospice View Post
    Honestly cant say. But Alive 2007 has a slight edge for me simply because of how they restructured the songs to make me fall in love with originals again.
    bit disappointing, they just playing the same songs on tour alive 2007. same playlist, different place

  4. Rep:
    Dithain's Avatar
    Posts
    35
    Points
    118
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Default

    Re: alive 1997 vs alive 2007

    The sheer effort put into Alive 2007, it's fairly understandable the reason why they played a constant set list, sure it could of varied here and there, but I personally thought what was put into 07 was "this is what we are".

  5. Rep:
    PlushKraken's Avatar
    Posts
    17
    Points
    69
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Germany
    Default

    Re: alive 1997 vs alive 2007

    Alive 1997 is more hit & miss, while Alive 2007 is pretty much awesome the whole way through. It's a near-perfect blend of pumping beats and cool funkiness. Another plus of Alive 2007 is that they had three albums worth of songs to choose and mash up.

    I listen to Alive 1997 more often at work because the first half is so raw and glorious. Having a nice beat to work fast to is one of the simpler joys of life.
    The second half is much more experimental, I tend to skip it if I'm not in the mood.

    So yeah, Alive 2007 wins in my opinion.

  6. Rep:
    britishmini's Avatar
    Posts
    227
    Points
    785
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Leeds
    Default

    Re: alive 1997 vs alive 2007

    I love how in 07, they pretty much got all their songs to marry up nicely... its epic.

    but for me, i prefer listening to 97 more regularly. dunno weather because its just constant... but it's just something nice to pass the time.

    In fairness tho both are outstanding, so it doesn't really matter which one is 'best'.

  7. Rep:
    daq422's Avatar
    Posts
    475
    Points
    1,348
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    A 5ecret 5tar 5ystem
    Default

    Re: alive 1997 vs alive 2007

    I'm pretty sure this thread has been started multiple times BUUUTT I honeslty do prefer Alive 1997 when it comes to music wise. I loved the era Daft Punk was just crazy, Thomas working the decks, drum machines and mixers so arbitrarily and the result being something so crazy and amazing, I do prefer Alive 97' because of the never ending mixing type style but in terms of experience i'd prefer 07'.

    I know I know confusing but, bare with me ._.'

  8. Rep:
    jamesrosenrosen's Avatar
    Posts
    501
    Points
    1,436
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Harlow, UK
    Default

    Re: alive 1997 vs alive 2007

    I prefer Alive 1997 due to the amount of sheer energy, but I adore 2007 because it was the first thing I listened to by them,

    also please use the search function http://www.thedaftclub.com/forum/sho...7-v-Alive-1997

  9. Rep:
    bananaeconomics's Avatar
    Posts
    1,391
    Points
    4,290
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Threed
    Default

    Re: alive 1997 vs alive 2007

    no. for me it's alive 1997 all the way.

    "So much people of you."

  10. Rep:
    daftbear's Avatar
    Posts
    85
    Points
    327
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Default

    Re: alive 1997 vs alive 2007

    The best of 1997 is the first song, the Daftendirekt/Da Funk mix

    0:00 - 0:32 Dat synth, my ****ing god.
    0:32 - 0:58 Nice bassdrum
    0:58 - 1:32 Daft Punk back to the funk come on + kick n snare + street noises. Warming up
    1:32 - 1:41 Almost there...
    1:41 - ORGASM
    1:41 - 2:22 If I'm listening to this walking with my headphones, i ****ing sync my legs to the beat and feel superior as ****. God bless Da Funk
    2:22 - 2:35 Daftendirekt starts to mess up with the kick. ****ing love at 2:30 when the voice syncs in a different way with the beat in a rap-like way.
    2:35 - 2:44 More orgasm. Did I said that this is my fav part of Da Funk? It's absolutely genious.
    2:44 - 3:18 Different Kick/snare with cymbals. More Daftendirekt.
    3:18 ORGASM
    3:18 - 3:52 ****ing love this synth. All those cymbals.
    3:52 - 4:35 Dat final Synth
    4:35 - 5:10 **** YES
    5:10 - 6:02 Multiple orgasms chain
    6:02 - 6:18 This clap is ****ing great
    6:18 - 7:25 Dafuq dafuq to, dafuq dafuq to, dafuq dafuq to, dafuq dafuq to... Damn, all this distortion...

    The rest of 1997 is also great, sounds totally different to 2007, more old-school and... wait, nspurway already talked about it

    Personally I love both shows. They are totally different... it's like comparing one of their album studios to another: ones prefer one for X and others prefer the other for Y, and both sides have valid opinions.
    Last edited by daftbear; 20th Apr 2013 at 17:57.

  11. Like Champiness likes this post
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Alive 2007 v. Alive 1997
    By nspurway in forum Releases
    Replies: 102
    Last Post: 5th Aug 2013, 11:24
  2. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 20th Jun 2013, 18:39